Home
Publications
Need for a paradigm shift
Publications
Need for a paradigm shift Access to Food
Introduction........................................................
Journalists
........................................................
Publications
........................................................
| Need for a paradigm shift |
|
|
| Written by Ochieng OGODO | |
| Friday, 27 February 2009 | |
|
By Ochieng OGODO, The Standard, Kenya
The food crisis that has hit the world hard in the last year, especially in Africa, brought to light the collective global ineptitude with which agriculture has been treated.
Steps to end poverty and hunger
The crisis squarely highlighted the need for essential steps that
must be taken to improve world food security and end poverty and
hunger; a paradigm shift that understands the nuances and takes
pragmatic advances for much improved agricultural and food production.
Hans Herren, President of the Washington based Millennium
Institute, said simple technologies and scientific researches focusing
on improvement of soil fertility are some of the critical pathways to
increased food production in Africa. “It is not expensive technologies
like chemical fertilisers and transgenic seed varieties,” he said.
African governments, he stated, should encourage technologies like crop
rotation, planting of leguminous plants for nitrogen fixation, no till
production, research and developments focused on improvement of soil
health.
His position is that it is high time smallholder farmers were
considered as managers of their ecosystems and even get compensated for
renewed interest in agriculture. Equally important, in his view, is
that they should be brought on board at policy making tables and in the
research processes instead of taking to them “complete packages they
understand nothing about.” Herren argued that only organic or what he
also termed ecological agriculture was the way out of the dwindling
food stocks and rising food prices and poverty and not subsidised
industrial agriculture. To achieve this, he observed, it was necessary
to educate the consumers on the type of foods they need as people were
not getting the truth since private interests of the large companies
were defining food policies.
“Stop industrial agriculture that is mining soil and also energy
intensive thus passing as one of the agents of global warming;
agriculture of the multinationals manufacturing seeds and other farm
technologies was drastically reducing soil health and people were not
being told the truth,” argued Herren. It is a scenario in which common
sense is put aside and money rules. Industrial agriculture is bankrupt
and for any single calorie produced you put ten more in high energy
usage. We can’t afford not to change the way we do agriculture and it
is up to the consumer to make this happen,” stated Herren.
Put emphasis on soil science
Putting emphasis on soil science and not seed traits or
fertilizers, he argued, will increase yield and address the food
crisis. “Promoting biotechnology or molecular biology was not all.
There is need to put emphasis on soil sciences as soils in Africa have
been destroyed by bad agricultural practices like mono-cropping,
introduction of ploughing, use of fertilizers while those in the north
have been ruined by bad technologies and no longer had deposits of the
nutrient range plants need.” “We should diversify crops like was done
many years back and not monocropping. Let us bring back the wild
relatives and get back production. Transgenic varieties interfere with
natural systems like natural pest control,” he observed.
Using transgenic varieties, Herren argued, was similar to dealing
with symptoms and not the problems in agriculture. “A good doctor
prevents and not the one who waits to treat. What will a single seed
variety achieve in a situation where agricultural production is faced
with multifaceted problems like lack of soil nutrients, water stress,”
he posed. The case of low production and resultant food crisis in some
parts of the world especially the developing countries was as result of
soil health and this can’t be addressed by transgenic agriculture.
In Africa, he said, food production could multiply in the next
three years through organic agriculture and mixed farming as it will
not only give people sufficient food but also put money into their
pockets through sale of the surplus. He strongly pitched for intensive
agricultural system that takes into consideration critical issues like
land, water retention, policies and sustainable farming systems for
significant increase in agricultural production. Organic farming, he
said, will build resilience in agriculture by rebuilding the capital
which in agriculture is soil. He suggested the creation of vocational
schools for imparting practical knowledge to farmers on organic farming
and not theoretical approaches in industrial agriculture.
Africa he said had been affected by climate change and experienced
extremes like flooding or prolonged droughts, the many pathogens and
farmers should grow varieties as one of the pathways of coping up with
climate change.
“Growing varieties in Africa,” Herren pointed out, “was one of the
best methods of dealing with weather variability. Transgenic seeds add
no value to what is already there but go against diverse genes and
crops varieties in the system.”
Pio Wennubst, permanent representative of Switzerland to Rome
based United Nations specialised agencies of the Food and Agricultural
Organisation [FAO], IFAD and World Food Programme [WFP] said organic
farming was one of the sure corridors out of the current food crisis as
it addresses costs and starts a full recovery of soil health. The
supply of relief food like being done by WFP, he said, was not helping
much since those areas remained hunger hotspots despite the assistance.
Giving Ethiopia as an example Wennubst said 90 percent of aid to the
country is used to buy food. Wennubst called for an all inclusive
system of managing agriculture in which the entire people in the food
chain, from production to marketing, worked together with policy making
and research processes.
Incompetent political leadership
The severe food crisis being experienced in Africa with millions
of people under the scourge of chronic hunger, starvation and
malnutrition was mostly due to incompetent political leadership
according to Kanoye Nwanze, the new International Fund for Agricultural
Development [IFAD] president
“There has to be the right policies and enough investments in
place to move agriculture forward. It is not enough to talk of
increased production without looking at linkages like developing local
markets,” he said. The Nigeria born Nwanze elected to that prestigious
post by IFAD Governing Council on February 19 said time had come to
address the problem of hunger, starvation and malnutrition in Africa
through new methods.
“Africa must realise that it cannot continue to apply the 19th And
20th centuries’ methods in agriculture in the 21st century. Things have
to change and Africa political leadership must show the way,” he
stated. “It is not necessary to tell farmers to increase production
when there are no roads linking them to markets, no access to credit
lines, to policy advice and knowledge and innovation,” he pointed out.
Nwanze who was elected by delegates from 165 Member States by
acclamation, a head of five other candidates from Pakistan, Germany,
Israel, Niger and India brings to the job thirty years of experience in
agriculture, rural development and research. He said Africa’s political
leadership has to be in the forefront if there has to be any agrarian
revolution to lift the millions of people currently wallowing in
poverty, hunger and starvation. He called for the building of strong
agricultural institutions in the rural areas saying more than half of
the population in Africa stay in those areas and depends on agriculture
for food, earnings and employment. Nwanze said it was high time
south-south collaboration in agricultural development was fostered
more adding that Africa could learn a lot from success stories in
certain parts of Asia and South America.
IFAD, he said, will continue to address farming in rural areas
through efforts like advisory work and provision of credit lines. “We
shall continue to grow and become stronger with focus on poor people,”
he said.
Smallholder farmers hold key
The outgoing IFAD President, Lennart Bage, said small holder
farmers hold key to food security and the current food crisis was
awake-up call to world leaders taken to improve world food security and
end poverty and hunger. “We are living through the most significant
global economic crisis of a generation, Bage noted. “Even before this
crisis, almost one in six already lived in hunger and poverty. That
number is now rising. Another 100 million people have been added over
the last year. This reversed the previous downward trend.” He pointed
out that while worldwide food demand is expected to jump 50 percent by
2030, agricultural productivity that grew up at 4 to 5 percent in
then1970s and 1980s has fallen to 1 to 2 percent today. Smallholder
farmers, he said, must be involved in global food supply responses.
“In Africa and Asia,” he said, smallholders farm 80m percent of
the total farmland. Globally, smallholder families constitute the vast
majority if of the poor, living on less than US$ 1 or US$ 2 day at the
same they are an important part of the global food production
potential. He said high productivity per acreage of existing farmland
is what was needed as there is limited scope to expand agricultural
land. “This requires political attention and much greater investment in
the whole agricultural value chain,” he said.
United Nations Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon, in a message to the
council said more efforts are needed to help the most vulnerable people
in developing nations.
“We must also contribute to long-term global food and nutrition
security by building resilience to challenges and crises, including
climate change, that endangered the hard-fought development gains we
have achieved,” Ki-Moon.
The Thirty-Second Session of IFAD’s Governing Council was
dominated by calls for greater investment in agriculture as response to
the steep economic downturn and as driver of economic growth in the
word’s poorest nation. Development aid to agriculture fell from US$8
billion in 1984 to US$3 billion in 2006.
|


